Dari Anas dan Qatadah, Rasulullah saw bersabda: Sesungguhnya beliau melarang seseorang minum sambil berdiri, Qotadah berkata:”Bagaimana dengan makan?” beliau menjawab: “Itu lebih buruk lagi”. (HR.Muslim dan Turmidzi)
Nov 10
Analisis tentang Makan dan Minum Sambil Berdiri ?
Nov 09
METODE MENGAJAR IPA
![]() |
| Mengajar |
Banyak metode yang bisa digunakan untuk mengajar IPA, setiap metode cocok diterapkan untuk materi pelajaran tertentu. Metode itu tidak ada yang bagus tetapi juga tidak ada yang jelek, sangat tergantung pada kemampuan guru yang menggunakannya. Marilah kita lihat satu persatu metode yang sering digunakan dalam pembelajaran IPA.
Pengertian:Cara penyajian pelajaran oleh guru dengan cara memberikan penjelasan secara lisan kepada siswa
Tujuan Metode ceramah :• Menyampaikan bahan yang bersifat informatif dan juga untuk memberitahukan penemuan-penemuan yang langka dan belum meluas
Nov 09
Fungsi Pendidikan
A. Pendidikan sebagai Ilmu Normatif
Nov 02
Metode Kooperatif
Nov 02
Chemistry Learning Using TAI and GI Methods Overviewd from the Student’s Curiousity and Creativity
ABSTRACT
This research was carried from June 2009 to March 2010 by using experimental method. The population was all of students of XIth grade MAN 1 Surakarta. The sample was taken using Purposive Random Sampling, the sample consisted of two classes, the firs-class as a TAI experimental and then as a GI the experiment. The data is collected by the test method and quetionnare. Data were analyzed using three ways of Anova folowed up by Anova Scheffe test.
From the result of data analysis can be concluded that: (1) there is an influence of TAI and GI method of learning achievement, Fa = 49,593 > Ftab = 3.99, (2) there is an influence of the students’ curiousity to the learning achievement, Fb = 28.983> Ftab = 3.99, (3) there is an influence of students’ creativity to the learning achievement, Fc = 30,682> Ftab = 3.99, (4) there is an interaction between students’ curiosity with the TAI and GI method of learning achievement, Fab = 21,091> Ftab = 3.99, (5) there is an interaction between students’ creativity with the TAI and GI method of learning achievement, Fac = 30,330 > Ftab = 3.99, (6) there was no interaction between the curiousity and students’ creativity toward learning achievement, Fabc = –52.40 < Ftab = 3.99, (7) there is no interaction between TAI and GI method, curiousity and students’ creativity toward learning achievement, Fabc = -102,072 < Ftab = 3.99. The implication to learning that is more interesting, meaningfull and that makes student more actif in learning process.
Follow





Komentar Terbaru